top of page

Guide for authors

About the journal

JMEPG is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal publishing research that advances understanding and practice in marine environmental policy, ocean governance, fisheries management, marine pollution, coastal sustainability, and socio-ecological systems. We welcome work that is interdisciplinary and policy-relevant, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods research.

Guide for authors

JMEPG provides a platform for scholarship that connects evidence to decisions in marine and coastal contexts. Topics include, but are not limited to:

  • Ocean and coastal governance frameworks; institutional design; regulatory instruments

  • Fisheries governance, co-management, compliance, enforcement, and fisher ecological knowledge

  • Marine pollution and plastics governance; microplastics pathways and mitigation; waste policy interfaces

  • Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), spatial planning, stakeholder engagement, and equity

  • Climate change adaptation, coastal resilience, and governance responses

  • Socio-ecological systems, environmental justice, livelihoods, and human dimensions

  • Indigenous, local, and traditional ecological knowledge in policy and management

  • Blue economy, ecosystem services, and sustainable development in marine contexts

Case studies are welcome where authors clearly show transferable relevance beyond the focal site.

​Article types

JMEPG welcomes:

Full-length Research Articles (typically 5,500–6,500 words including references)

Short Articles / Research Notes / Policy Notes (3,000–4,000 words including references)

Review Articles (scoping reviews, systematic reviews, or critical syntheses)

Policy Analyses / Perspectives (evidence-based, clearly argued, policy-relevant)

Methods Papers (where methods materially advance marine policy/governance research)

Special Issues / Thematic Collections (by proposal)

Peer review

All manuscripts undergo double-blind peer review.


Initial assessment

Upon submission, manuscripts are screened by the editorial office for completeness and suitability. The Managing Editor assesses fit to scope and basic quality requirements.


External review

If suitable, the manuscript is assigned to an Associate Editor who invites a minimum of two independent double-blind peer reviewers. The Associate Editor evaluates the reviews alongside the manuscript and makes a recommendation to the Editor-in-Chief, who makes the final decision.
 

Editorial independence and conflicts

Editors do not handle manuscripts where a conflict exists (e.g., authored by the editor, close collaborators, or direct institutional conflicts). In such cases, the manuscript is reassigned and handled independently.

Open access

JMEPG is open access. Please see the Open Access Information page for licensing and APC details.

Ethics and policies

Ethics in publishing

JMEPG follows principles consistent with COPE guidance on publication ethics. Submissions may be rejected or retracted where ethical misconduct is identified (including plagiarism, data fabrication, duplicate publication, or undisclosed conflicts of interest).
 

Submission declaration

By submitting, authors confirm that:

  • the work is original and not under consideration elsewhere

  • all authors approve the submission and the final submitted version

  • the work complies with applicable legal/ethical requirements (including permits and approvals where relevant)
     

Authorship

Authorship is reserved for those who made substantial contributions to:

  • the conception/design or data acquisition/analysis/interpretation

  • drafting or critically revising the manuscript

  • approving the final version and taking responsibility for the work

Contributors who do not meet authorship criteria should be listed in Acknowledgements.
 

Changes to authorship

Authorship changes (addition/removal/reorder) are considered only before acceptance and require:

  • a written request from the corresponding author explaining the reason

  • written confirmation from all authors (including any being added/removed)
     

Declaration of competing interests

All authors must disclose financial or personal relationships that could influence the work (e.g., employment, consultancies, funding, paid advisory roles, board memberships, equity/stock, or affiliations with the journal).
 

Funding sources

Authors must disclose all sources of funding and the role of funders (if any) in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and publication decisions.
 

Declaration of generative AI use

If generative AI tools were used to support writing, language editing, or structuring (not as an author), authors must include a disclosure statement in the manuscript:

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted tools
“During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used [tool name/version] for [purpose]. The authors reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content.”

Generative AI tools must not be listed as authors.
 

Preprints

Posting a manuscript as a preprint does not count as prior publication. If the manuscript is accepted and published, authors should update the preprint record with a link to the final version (if available).
 

Inclusive language

Authors should use inclusive language and avoid biased or discriminatory wording unless strictly relevant and justified.
 

Reporting sex- and gender-based analyses

Where studies involve humans, animals, or sex/gender-relevant dimensions, authors should report how sex and/or gender were considered in study design, analysis, interpretation, or limitations.
 

Jurisdictional claims

JMEPG takes a neutral position on territorial or jurisdictional claims shown in maps or affiliations. Maps should clearly delineate study areas and avoid unnecessary political boundary emphasis.

Writing and formatting

File format and layout (required)

  • Submit manuscripts in Microsoft Word format only: .doc or .docx

  • Use a single-column layout (do not submit two-column manuscripts)

  • Font: Times New Roman or Arial, 12 pt (choose one and use consistently)

  • Spacing: 1.0 (single-spaced) throughout, including references, tables, and figure captions

  • Margins: 2.5 cm on all sides

  • Page numbers: required

  • Line numbers: continuous line numbering required (helps peer review)

  • Turn off Track Changes and remove comments before submission

  • Do not use underlining except for URLs (if unavoidable)
     

Language, style, and tone

  • Manuscripts must be written in clear academic English 

  • Write in a precise, neutral, policy-relevant style:

    • Avoid emotive or activist language unless it is part of a clearly framed argument

    • Define normative terms (e.g., “sustainability”, “equity”, “fairness”, “good governance”)

  • Use inclusive language and avoid biased descriptors unless directly relevant and justified

  • Prefer active voice where appropriate, but keep readability as priority
     

Units, terminology, abbreviations and naming conventions
Use SI units and the metric system

  • Define all abbreviations at first mention (e.g., Marine Protected Area (MPA))

  • Use consistent terminology throughout (e.g., don’t alternate between “microplastics contamination” and “microplastic pollution” unless you define distinctions)

  • Scientific names: italicise genus and species (e.g., Perna perna). After first mention, you may abbreviate genus (e.g., P. perna)

  • For legal/policy terms: define jurisdiction and instrument clearly (e.g., “South Africa’s Marine Living Resources Act (MLRA)”)
     

Manuscript components and order (required)

Submit your manuscript in this order:

  1. Title page (separate first page)

  2. Abstract

  3. Keywords

  4. Main text

  5. Acknowledgements (if any)

  6. Declarations (required statements — see below)

  7. References

  8. Figure legends

  9. Tables

  10. Figures (embedded after tables OR appended after references—choose one format and be consistent)

Important: For double-blind review, remove identifying information from the main text file if your system requires anonymised manuscripts. If you’re submitting by email, you can use a separate Title Page and an Anonymous Manuscript file.

​

Title page (required)

Include:

  • Title (≤15 words; sentence case; no abbreviations unless essential)

  • Full author names

  • Affiliations (department, institution, city, country)

  • ORCID iDs (recommended for all authors; required for corresponding author)

  • Corresponding author: email + full postal address

  • Word count (including references)

  • Article type (e.g., Research Article / Policy Analysis / Review)

​

Abstract (required)

  • Maximum 250 words

  • Must stand alone (no citations, no undefined abbreviations)

  • Prefer a structured abstract:

Objective – What the paper addresses and why
Methods – Data sources, design, analytical approach
Key findings – Main results (not a full discussion)
Policy/governance implications – Why this matters in practice
Value proposition – What is novel or distinctive

​

Keywords (required)

  • Provide up to 5 keywords

  • Alphabetise and separate with commas

  • Avoid multi-word phrases where possible (unless a term is standard in the field, e.g., “marine protected area”)
     

Highlights (optional but encouraged)

Provide 3–5 bullet points that capture:

  • The paper’s key contribution(s)

  • Novel insight(s), method(s), or dataset(s)

  • Policy or governance relevance

(You can include these at the end of the manuscript or as a separate file.)

​

Headings and structure

Use a clear hierarchy (maximum three levels):

  1. Major section headings: bold, sentence case, left aligned (no punctuation)

  2. Subheadings: bold, sentence case

  3. Sub-subheadings: italic, sentence case

 

Suggested structures

Quantitative / empirical policy studies

  • Introduction

  • Methods

  • Results

  • Discussion

  • Implications/Conclusion

​

Qualitative studies

  • Introduction

  • Study context / setting

  • Methods (sampling, data collection, ethics)

  • Analytical approach (e.g., thematic analysis, grounded theory)

  • Findings (themes)

  • Discussion

  • Implications/Conclusion

​

Policy and legal analysis

  • Introduction

  • Background / policy context

  • Analytical framework (if used)

  • Findings / argument / evaluation

  • Recommendations / implications

  • Conclusion

​

Declarations (required)

Place these before the references (as short labelled sections):

  • Funding (or “This research received no specific funding…”)

  • Competing interests (or “The authors declare no competing interests.”)

  • Ethics approval (where relevant; include approval number if available)

  • Consent (if human participants were involved, where relevant)

  • Data availability statement (even if “not applicable”)

  • Generative AI disclosure (only if used; otherwise omit)

​​​

Reporting requirements for qualitative and mixed-methods papers

To strengthen rigor and reproducibility, qualitative submissions should clearly state:

  • Study design and rationale

  • Sampling strategy (who, how many, why)

  • Data collection method (interviews, focus groups, document review, observation)

  • Data analysis method (thematic analysis, content analysis, discourse analysis, etc.)

  • Trustworthiness strategies (e.g., triangulation, member checking, reflexivity, audit trail)

  • Limitations and transferability

For mixed-methods, explain:

  • Sequence (convergent vs explanatory vs exploratory)

  • Integration points (where qualitative and quantitative findings inform each other)

​

Tables

  • Tables must be editable (Word tables), not images

  • Number tables sequentially: Table 1, Table 2…

  • Provide a concise caption above each table

  • Use minimal formatting:

    • No vertical lines

    • Minimal horizontal rules

  • Use footnotes with lowercase letters (a, b, c) where needed

  • Ensure tables are interpretable without the main text (“stand alone”)

​

Figures, images and artwork

  • Number figures sequentially: Figure 1, Figure 2…

  • Provide captions below each figure

  • Ensure all text in figures is readable when reduced

  • Multi-panel figures must be labelled A, B, C…

  • Acceptable formats: PNG, JPG, TIFF (TIFF preferred for highest quality)

  • If maps are included:

    • Use common mapping standards

    • Show only the relevant study area

    • Avoid politically sensitive boundary claims unless essential

    • Include a brief neutrality note if needed

​

Use of third-party content (required)

If you use any figure, table, image, or substantial text from another source:

  • Obtain permission where needed

  • Provide appropriate attribution

  • Confirm that reuse is permitted under the relevant license

​

Supplementary material

  • Submit supplementary files separately with clear names:

    • “Supplementary_Table_S1.docx”

    • “Supplementary_Figure_S1.png”

  • Provide a short caption/description for each

  • Cite supplementary items in the text (e.g., “see Supplementary Table S1”)

​

Theory and analytical frameworks

Where relevant, authors may include a theory or analytical framework section. This section should:

  • Build on the conceptual background presented in the Introduction

  • Clearly explain how theory informs the analysis, interpretation, or policy evaluation

  • Be directly linked to subsequent sections of the manuscript

Highly technical or mathematical derivations should be included only where essential and clearly explained for an interdisciplinary readership.

​

Glossary (optional)

If specialised or field-specific terminology is used extensively (e.g., legal terms, governance instruments, fisheries management concepts), authors may include a glossary.

  • Define terms concisely and consistently

  • Place the glossary after the main text and before the references, or in an appendix

​

Footnotes

Footnotes should be used sparingly and only where necessary to clarify contextual, legal, or explanatory points.

  • Number footnotes consecutively

  • Use Word’s automatic footnote function, or clearly indicate placement in the text

  • Avoid using footnotes for essential arguments or results that belong in the main text

​

Acknowledgements

The Acknowledgements section should appear as a separate, unnumbered section immediately before the References.

This section may include:

  • Individuals who assisted with fieldwork, interviews, analysis, mapping, or technical support

  • Language editing or proofreading assistance

  • Institutional or community support

Do not include acknowledgements:

  • On the title page

  • As a footnote to the title

  • Within the main text

​

Author contributions (CRediT)

Corresponding authors are required to include an Author Contributions statement using the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy).

Roles include, but are not limited to:

  • Conceptualization

  • Data curation

  • Formal analysis

  • Funding acquisition

  • Investigation

  • Methodology

  • Project administration

  • Resources

  • Software

  • Supervision

  • Validation

  • Visualization

  • Writing – original draft

  • Writing – review and editing

Not all roles will apply to every manuscript, and authors may contribute under multiple roles.

​

Funding sources

Authors must disclose all sources of financial support for the research and/or manuscript preparation.

The statement should clearly indicate:

  • The funding organisation(s)

  • Grant numbers (where applicable)

  • The role of funders in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and publication decisions

Standard format:

Funding: This work was supported by [Funding body name] [grant number xxxx].

If funders had no role in the research or publication process, this should be stated explicitly.

If no funding was received, authors should include:

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

​

Appendices

Appendices should be used to present supplementary material essential for transparency but not suitable for inclusion in the main text (e.g., extended methods, legal texts, interview guides, survey instruments).

  • Identify appendices as Appendix A, Appendix B, etc.

  • Number equations, tables, and figures separately within each appendix:

    • Equations: Eq. (A.1), Eq. (A.2)

    • Tables: Table A.1, Table A.2

    • Figures: Fig. A.1, Fig. A.2

Each appendix should be clearly referenced in the main text.

​​

Referencing and citation style (summary)

  • Use Author–Year in-text citations

  • Reference list in alphabetical order

  • Include DOIs where available

  • Ensure every in-text citation appears in the reference list and vice versa

References

In-text citations

Use Author–Year format (not numbered):

  • (Johnson et al., 2004; Smith, 2018)

  • Order multiple citations chronologically

  • Use letters for same-author same-year: (Smith, 2010a, 2010b)

Avoid citing unpublished data or personal communications in the reference list; if essential, cite parenthetically in-text with date and affiliation.

​

Reference list

List references alphabetically by first author surname, then by co-authors, then by year.

Examples

Journal article
Green, T.L., Summers, E.C., Reed, F.R. (2021). Title of article. Journal Title, 12(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/xx.xxxx/xxxxx

 

Book
Smith, J. (2012). Book Title (3rd ed.). Publisher, City, Country.

 

Chapter in edited book
Dwyer, S.P. (2021). Chapter title. In: Patel, J.K., O’Brien, L.R. (Eds.), Book Title. Publisher, City, pp. 201–238.

 

Website
Organization. (Year). Title. Full URL (accessed Day Month Year).

 

Dataset
Author(s). (Year). Dataset title [dataset]. Repository, version. DOI/URL.

Submitting your manuscript

Submission instructions

  • Manuscripts must be original and not under consideration elsewhere.

  • Submit via email to: jmepg.journal@gmail.com (update if you later move to an online system)

Include:

  • Manuscript file (.doc/.docx)

  • Cover letter (recommended)

  • Any supplementary files

  • Competing interests statement

  • Funding statement

  • Generative AI disclosure (if applicable)
     

Plagiarism and Originality Screening

To support academic integrity and originality, all submissions must be accompanied by an originality report generated using Turnitin or an equivalent plagiarism-detection software.

The originality report should be uploaded at the time of submission as a separate supporting document. Submissions without an accompanying originality report will not be considered for peer review.

Authors are responsible for ensuring that:

  • The submitted work is original and has not been published elsewhere;

  • Proper citation and attribution are provided for all sources;

  • Any overlap with previously published or submitted work is fully disclosed.

The editorial team reserves the right to conduct additional originality checks at any stage of the review or publication process. Manuscripts found to exhibit unacceptable levels of similarity, plagiarism, or redundant publication may be rejected in accordance with COPE guidelines.
 

Submission checklist

Before submitting, confirm:

  • Corresponding author details included

  • Manuscript follows formatting rules

  • Figures/tables are correctly numbered and cited

  • References are complete and consistent

  • Permissions obtained for third-party material

  • Ethics, funding, and competing interest statements included

After receiving a final decision

Publication agreement

After acceptance, authors will be asked to confirm the publishing license and open-access terms.
 

License options

Authors select a Creative Commons license (CC BY / CC BY-NC / CC BY-NC-ND) per the journal’s Open Access policy.
 

Proof correction

Authors will receive proofs for final checking of typesetting, completeness, and accuracy. Substantive changes at proof stage require editorial approval.
 

Responsible sharing

Authors are encouraged to share the final published article via repositories, websites, and communications channels, with appropriate citation and licensing.

bottom of page