top of page
Traditional Library

Submission Guidelines

Traditional Library

Instructions to Authors

All manuscripts are submitted undergo a rigorous peer-review process. We utilize a double-blind peer review, meaning that the authors’ identities are known to the editors and reviewers, while the reviewers’ identities remain confidential unless they choose to reveal themselves.

​

Upon submission, manuscripts are initially evaluated by the Managing Editor to determine their quality and suitability for publication in our journal. The Managing Editor then assigns the manuscript to an Associate Editor with expertise in the relevant subject area, who may also assess its suitability for external review. Manuscripts meeting these criteria will be forwarded to one or more external reviewers.

The Associate Editor evaluates the reviews and the manuscript before making a recommendation to the Editor-in-Chief, who ultimately decides on publication.

​

Please note that the editorial team reserves the right to edit manuscripts for style and clarity before publication.

Ethics and Conflicts of Interest

Authors are expected to adhere to rigorous ethical standards in line with the guidelines set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Instances of ethical misconduct will be treated with utmost seriousness and handled according to the COPE guidelines. For further details on our ethical policies, please refer to the Publication Ethics webpage.

​

By submitting a manuscript for consideration in the African Journal of Environmental Ethics and Conservation (AJEEC), authors affirm that their research was conducted ethically and in compliance with relevant local, national, or international regulations governing the collection, care, and use of animals. This includes obtaining valid collecting and transport permits, as well as necessary approvals for access to and respectful use of field sites, particularly those of environmental or cultural significance. We encourage collaborative efforts with local colleagues in field research areas, with due recognition of their contributions either in the authorship line or Acknowledgments section, as appropriate. Editors retain the authority to reject submissions deemed unethical or non-compliant with these guidelines.

​

The African Journal of Environmental Ethics and Conservation (AJEEC) is inclusive of all members of the scientific community, regardless of affiliation with academic, governmental, industrial, or other organizations. To facilitate transparency and enable our editors, peer reviewers, and readers to assess authors' professional credentials and potential biases, we request authors to disclose all relevant information about their employment affiliations and any financial interests pertinent to the submitted work. Reviewers are also encouraged to disclose similar information relevant to the manuscripts they are evaluating.

Authorship

Authorship in the African Journal of Environmental Ethics and Conservation (AJEEC) is reserved for individuals who have significantly contributed to the conception, design, execution, and intellectual content of the work. 

We adhere to the authorship criteria established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), which includes:

  • Substantial involvement in the conception, design, acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data.

  • Drafting or revising the work critically for important intellectual content.

  • Providing final approval of the version to be published.

  • Agreeing to be accountable for all aspects of the work's accuracy and integrity.

 

Contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be acknowledged but not listed as authors. Our journal prohibits ghost authorship and honorary authorship. We do not recognize natural language processing tools driven by artificial intelligence (AI) as authors, and any use of AI in research should be transparently disclosed in the manuscript.

The corresponding author is responsible for affirming the originality and previous publication status of the submitted work. Authorship changes, including the author list, order, or corresponding author designation, require approval from the Editor-in-Chief and unanimous agreement from all co-authors. The journal does not intervene in authorship disputes, which must be resolved by the individuals and their institutions prior to publication.

Authors intending to use Read and Publish funding for open access publication should note that changing the corresponding author to access these funds is not permitted. For further details on authorship policies and procedures, authors are encouraged to consult COPE guidelines and contact our Author Support team if necessary.

Submission Instructions

​Articles submitted for publication should express original research/critical study and should not be under consideration in any other publication at the same time, in any form or shape.


Original full-length research papers of between 5500-6000 words including the reference list (slightly more or slightly less) are welcomed. Longer articles will be considered depending on the value of the research. Shorter articles in the form of conceptual research notes or critical analysis of between 3000-4000 words will also be considered.

​

The editorial team welcomes inquiries regarding the suitability of potential submissions prior to formal submission. Manuscripts should be prepared using Microsoft Word  for Microsoft Windows platforms exclusively. Submissions should be sent via email attachment to           , in either .doc or .docx format.

​

In addition to the manuscript, authors are requested to provide:

  • A Turn-It-In or similar plagiarism detection software report accompanying the article.

  • The author(s) should include their Orcid ID.

 

Please be aware that submission of a manuscript signifies that you are the corresponding author and that the Journal may retain your email address for communication regarding the article as necessary. Corresponding authors must promptly inform the journal of any changes in contact information.

Please note that submission of a manuscript does not guarantee publication. All submissions undergo peer review, and manuscripts may be either accepted for publication or declined. The journal does not provide specific reasons for the rejection of manuscripts.

​

Authors should understand that submission of an article indicates agreement to the aforementioned conditions. The Journal does not maintain copies of rejected articles, nor is it obliged to provide reasons for their rejection.

Manuscript Preparation

 The African Journal of Environmental Ethics & Conservation will only be published online.

​

General

Initial submissions must adhere to the following guidelines:
Manuscripts must be written in English;
Manuscripts must be submitted in .doc or .docx format (MS Word)
Manuscripts must be single-spaced, with 2.5-cm margins;
Manuscripts must contain page numbers and continuous line numbers;
The manuscript’s in-text citations must be in Author-Year format (e.g., Johnson et al. 2004; Smith 2018), not numbered.


Manuscripts must include the following, in this order:
Cover Page:

Article title (<15 words, in sentence case, with scientific names in italics)

Author names and full affiliations, including ORCiD numbers for all authors (visit www.orcid.org to register).  At least one author of the manuscript must be designated as Corresponding author*

 

First Page:

  1. Abstract (about 5% of main manuscript text)

Abstracts should adhere to the following guidelines. Preferably structured as follows:

  • Study Objective: Clearly articulate the objective of the study, delineating the overarching purpose and aim.

  • Methodology: Describe the approach or methodology employed in conducting the research, outlining the systematic framework utilized.

  • Results: Highlight the key findings and conclusions derived from the study, emphasizing significant outcomes.

  • Implications: Summarize the implications of the study, elucidating the potential ramifications for environmental ethics and conservation practices.

  • Value Proposition: Clearly articulate the unique contribution of the paper, showcasing its novelty or distinctiveness without referencing external sources.

Do not cite references in the abstract.

​     2. Keywords

 Provide a maximum of up to five (5) keywords suitable for indexing,  alphabetized and separated by commas

 

Main manuscript text

  • Include these main headings: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgements, Supplementary Data, References ((in alphabetical order by author last name), Figure Legends, Tables

  • Tables with captions (captions for tables are placed above the table and numbered; one per page)

  • Figures with captions (captions for figures are placed below the figure and numbered; one per page); for further guidance on figure format, see the "Tables and Figures" section

  • Tables and figures must be embedded sequentially in the document, after the References

  • When included, Supplementary Data should be uploaded as separate, individual files.

  •  AJEEC employs a hierarchical heading structure, comprising up to threelevels. While most articles will utilize only levels #1 (major section headings) and #3, authors should adhere to the following guidelines for consistency and clarity:

1. Major Section Headings (#1): These headings introduce major sections of the manuscript and should be in sentence case and left-justified. They do not end with punctuation.

2. Subsection Headings (#2): Subsection headings are optional and should be used sparingly. They should be in sentence case, left-justified, and bold.

3. Subsubsection Headings (#3): Subsubsections provide further subdivision within subsections and are italicized. They should be in sentence case, left-justified

 

Authors are encouraged to maintain consistency in heading usage and formatting throughout their manuscripts to enhance readability and organization.

​

Citations

  • Citations within the text should adhere to the "Author-Year" format. Multiple in-text citations should be arranged chronologically, separated by semicolons (e.g., Author1 1998; Author2 1999). When citing works with three or more authors or editors, use the first author's last name followed by "et al." In-text citations should be ordered chronologically by the lead author's surname.

  • In cases where multiple works by the same author are published in the same year, differentiate them with lowercase letters (e.g., Author 2010a, 2010b), with the first article cited designated as "a" and separated by a comma.

  • References cited in the text should direct readers to pertinent literature, and it is recommended to limit citations to the minimum necessary to support a given point. Typically, no more than three citations are needed.

  • Please note that unpublished data, reports, preprints, and personal communications cannot be cited. Accepted manuscripts should be confirmed as "in press."

  • Personal observations or communications should be parenthetically cited in the text, including the source's name, affiliation, and the date of communication.

​

​

Terminology, Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Measurement Units

It is imperative to ensure clarity and consistency in the use of terminology, abbreviations, acronyms, and measurement units.

  • Define all symbols and spell out acronyms upon first mention. For instance, when referring to the African Elephant (Loxodonta africana), state the genus name in full followed by the species name on the first occasion of use. Subsequently, abbreviate the genus (L. africana) for brevity.

  • Incorporate the metric system and SI units for all measurements. Embrace terminologies such as "Miocene" instead of "Recent," and "K/Pg" rather than "K/T." Utilize BP for years before present, My for million years, and Ma for million years ago. For example, "The Miocene epoch spanned 23 My, from 23 Ma to 5.3 Ma."

  • Consistently employ numerals to express both whole and decimal numbers across all scientific contexts, including text, titles, tables, and figure captions.

  • Spell out single-digit ordinals and common fractions to maintain readability and precision within scientific discourse. For instance, express "one-third" rather than "1/3," and "ninth" instead of "9th."

  • We encourage authors to employ clear and standardized reporting practices for statistical data. Please express "mean" in full text, while utilizing "xÌ„" accompanied by standard deviation (SD) for numerical values.

  • For instance, indicate "We report the mean ± SD," but represent specific values as "8.5 ± 1.3 (xÌ„ ± SD)." Similarly, initially spell out "chi-square test," but thereafter utilise the value "X^2" for numerical representation. For example, state "We employed a chi-square test," followed by "X^2 = 174.85" for specific values. Adhering to these guidelines ensures consistency and clarity in statistical reporting throughout your manuscript.

​

Tables and Figures

To ensure clarity and independence, all tables and figures must be comprehensible without referring to the main text, effectively allowing them to “stand alone.” Consequently, legends should comprehensively detail species names, locations, and collection dates associated with the data in the tables or figures.

​

Each table should commence on a new page within the manuscript. Tables must be presented in text format, such as a formatted table in Word, and not as static images. Only the initial word in column or row headings should be capitalized, except for proper nouns. The title "Table xx" should be in bold font and indented. Footnotes within tables should be indicated using lowercase letters. Tables must be devoid of vertical lines and should contain only three horizontal lines: one at the top, one beneath the column headings, and one at the bottom.

​

When submitting figures for publication, authors are advised to use widely accepted file formats such as TIFF. The Editor-in-Chief will determine the appropriate size for each figure upon review. Ensure that all lettering and figure legends are sufficiently large to remain legible in the final published format. For figures with multiple panels, each panel should be distinctly labeled with a capital letter (e.g., “A”, “B”), and these labels should correspond with the figure legend for clarity.

​

Note: When incorporating figures not originally created by the authors, it is imperative to secure the most comprehensive distribution rights feasible. This includes permissions for all formats, editions, languages, and global territories, covering the entire duration of the copyright. Authors must ensure they have both electronic and print rights. In cases where electronic rights for third-party content cannot be obtained, authors must seek guidance from the Editor-in-Chief prior to further action.

​

References Section Guidelines

Citations within the manuscript must correspond precisely with entries in the "References" section. This alignment is crucial for maintaining academic integrity and facilitating readers' access to the original sources. The references should be sorted first by the surname of the first author, then by additional authors, and finally by the publication date for works by the same authors.

​

When listing authors, include all names up to ten authors. If a publication has more than ten authors, list the first ten followed by "et al." to acknowledge the extensive collaboration. Titles of works should follow a consistent capitalization pattern, with only the first word and proper nouns capitalized. Italicize all scientific names in the titles to highlight their taxonomic significance.

​

For journal articles, write out the complete names of the journals to avoid ambiguity and ensure that readers can easily locate the referenced materials. This practice enhances the clarity and professionalism of the manuscript, aligning with the rigorous standards expected in the fields of environmental ethics and conservation.

​

When preparing your manuscript, it is crucial to adhere to the citation formats outlined in the References section

Journal Articles

Green, T.L., Summers, E.C., & Reed, F.R. (2021). Ethical implications of habitat destruction in urban planning. Environmental Ethics and Conservation, 12(1), 45-60. 

​

Books

Smith, J. (2012). Avian Species of the Pacific Northwest. 3rd ed. Seattle (WA, USA): Stonehenge Press.

​

Chapters in Edited Books

Dwyer, S. P. (2021). The Ethical Dilemma of Urban Wildlife Management. In J. K. Patel & L. R. O'Brien (Eds.), Perspectives on Conservation Ethics: Integrating Theory and Practice (Vol. 3). Vancouver, Canada: Pacific Wildlife Press. pp. 201–238.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​​​​

​

Manuscript text should preferably have a succinct introduction, literature review, methods, results and discussion, implications/conclusion. Exceptions to this structure will be limited to conceptual papers, critical reviews or research notes.

Beautiful Nature

Submit your article

 Click below to begin the submission process and join a community dedicated to advancing environmental ethics and conservation across Africa and the world.

bottom of page